Should Beyoncé make us drink Pepsi?

Pop star Beyoncé Knowles as literal mouthpiece

Pop star Beyoncé Knowles as literal mouthpiece

The aforementioned Mark Bittman—whose beans and greens recipe came out great last night, by the way—has used his Times column to call out Beyoncé for endorsing Pepsi. His intentionally provocative contention is that one day we will view sugary sodas as comparable to cigarettes in their impact on public health. Quote:

From saying, as she once did in referring to [Michelle Obama’s fitness initiative] Let’s Move, that she was “excited to be part of this effort that addresses a public health crisis,” she’s become part of an effort that promotes a public health crisis. I suppose it would be one thing if she needed the money or the exposure but she and Jay-Z are worth around $775 million.

Since we’re a bunch of grizzled old ethicists around here, I thought we might take up the question: Is it wrong for Beyoncé to sell her endorsement to Pepsi?

Continue reading

Friday links! Return to normalcy edition

Warren G. Harding and some skank

Warren G. Harding and some prime postwar tail

Back in 1920, self-made newspaper publisher and beloved milquetoast Warren G. Harding ran for President promising a “return to normalcy”—the resumption of American life as it was lived before World War I. Ask Scott Fitzgerald how that worked out. The past is past, and its very passage confirms our endorsement of the process that carries it away from us. Even when we return to normalcy—or, if you’re a jerk, “normality“—we do so remembering the weirdicy that came before, and we are changed. Today is Friday, and United has returned me to Missoula in a mere 13 hours. My fish are somehow alive, thanks to Ben al-Fowlkes, and I am standing at my desk as if nothing happened. Fortunately for the links, however, a bunch of stuff went down. Won’t you settle in with the uneasy memory of one who has woken from a dream with me?

Continue reading

Combat! blog flies through air, is abuseful

Air-Travel

Our long, cross-continental journey draws to an end today, and Combat! blog will spend the next 12 hours in various states of waiting and transport. Or we’ll get stuck in Denver again. Either way, though, there is no blog today. Those of you who just can’t live without my mellifluous typographical errors can read this editorial in the Missoula Independent, in which I am mean to state representative David Howard. He deserves it. Or, if your taste in absurdity runs toward the physical, there’s also this compilation of Russian dash cam videos:

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXz4P6EpX3s

So maybe there is something to be said for air travel. I’ll see you tomorrow, or possibly Monday, or maybe from a smoking crater in the Nebraska plains. Probably the first one.

 

Congress passes fiscal bill, averting reign of Satan

John Boehner and Harry Reid

John Boehner and Harry Reid go out for Indian food, spend hours looking for a Thai place they heard about, wind up going home and making quesadillas.

I spoke too soon. The House has passed a Senate bill to make permanent the Bush-era tax cuts for individuals making less than $400,000 a year and prevent large cuts to defense and military spending. It was ugly. Congress has not voted on a bill on New Year’s Day since 1951, when it approved spending for the Korean War. That adventure was a resounding success compared to what happened yesterday, when 151 House Republicans voted against a bill that required hail-Mary negotiations even to reach the floor. To give you an idea of what John Boehner had to contend with, here’s Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina:

I have read the bill and can’t find the spending cuts—even with an electron magnifying glass. It’s part medicinal, part placebo, and part treating the symptoms but not the underlying pathology.

Daniel Webster he is not.

Continue reading

Happy New Year! These jerks still have $2 billion

AP0901060255551-e1323728513880

No one could have foreseen it, but the end of the year is upon us, and an agreement to avert the fiscal cliff is not in place. We all kind of knew that Congress was not working properly, that it had quantitatively passed fewer laws and qualitatively reached less agreement than the infamous do-nothing Congress of the Truman administration. Now we have concrete evidence. Not to put too fine a point on it, but Congress has failed, as Chris Cillizza and Aaron Blake observe. Maybe it’s because they lack individual incentives to function as a group. Maybe it’s because they reflect our degraded discourse. Maybe it’s because one party has defined itself in opposition to the political system even as it does everything it can to become the most part of it. I don’t know, but the result is clear and incontrovertible.

It is also maybe not such a big deal. Chances are, the federal government will stay its hand before it pushes the knife all the way into itself. The stock market will freak out, but chances are the changes in our tax code will be undone before April arrives. Spending will likely be uncut, too, before it has a chance to wreck the economy. And, more importantly, the world does not begin and end at the doors to the United States capital. As much as we like to forget it around here, there is more to life than politics. There is even more to life than politics and culture. A new year is upon us, and the future is unwritten, as always. The recent future—better known as the past—was written poorly. But an author is measured by the sum of his successes, not his average, and tomorrow is a clean white sheet. Take up your pen, gentle reader, and drive it forward in to the quivering eyeball of your dreams. Or keep doing whatever and saying you’ll fix everything later. Dealer’s choice.