Steve King is a stupid man

Hi, I'm Steve King, and I'm an American just like you. My bathtub is ringed with toasters, and I once spent 13 hours lost in a revolving door. Who else wants pancakes?

Those of us from Iowa used to lament that our Republican senator, Charles Grassley, had become the face of opposition to health care reform. Why did the most recognizable Iowan in national politics have to be a wizened elf who accused every bill of providing free abortions to immigrants and kept assuring us that the Death Panels were in there somewhere? I, for one, wished that someone else—anyone else—could serve as Iowa’s delegate to the national imagination. That, boys and girls, is why you must never wish. Representative Steve King (R–IA) has fulfilled our longings in the most ironically disappointing way possible. Sure, Chuck Grassley is an asshole, a stubborn hick whose Twitter feed read “Barb made oatmeal,” on the day his committee abandoned the attempt to reach bipartisan consensus on health care reform. But yesterday Steve King called for the overthrow of the United States government. Apparently Congressman King has forgotten where he works, along with a bunch of other important information that might otherwise have allowed him to make a useful contribution to the operation of America. In speaking to the Huffington Post, he called for a peaceful takeover of Congress similar to Prague’s Velvet Revolution, and likened the state of our country to that of Czechoslovakia under Soviet communism. “It is very, very close,” he said. “It is the nationalization of our liberty and the federal government taking our liberty over.” Which raises a lot questions, not the least of which is whether Representative King knows what that word means.

King is referring, of course, to a bill that would further regulate the health care industry and provide subsidies for poor people to buy insurance. Such a thing would, of course, constitute a gross nationalization of our liberty, in the sense that our liberty would immediately become an interstate industry that sold goods and services at a profit, and the federal government would own the bulk of that industry’s capital and oversee its administration. Also, the government would take it over. One can forgive Representative King his shaky grasp of this political-economic term, since he probably heard it for the first as a buzzword last year, while he was voting on a series of multibillion-dollar appropriations bills. Whether Steve King fully understands high school-level macroeconomics isn’t the point. The point is that, in light of the possibility that Congress will set limits to insurers’ exceptions for pre-existing conditions and provide low-income purchasers of private coverage with a tax credit, the time has come to abandon elections, to dismantle Congress, to “storm this city, fill up Washington D.C., jam this capital so they can’t move.” After 234 years, Steve King has called an end to the American democratic experiment.

Let us put aside, for a moment, the hyperbolic stupidity of King’s argument. Let us forget his assertion that if we decide against health care reform, “you will have your liberty back,” and let’s try to ignore the fact that every time he appears in public, he is wearing the same expression your drunk uncle assumes right before he says something inappropriate at your rehearsal dinner. The electromagnetic field of a microphone does something screwy to Steve King’s brain, and we accept that. What I can’t understand—whether King actually believes this stuff or has just decided that it’s a good way to whip up elderly voters—is where he thinks it could possibly take him from here.

Let’s say that, due to a previously unnoticed chemical found in most brands of toothpaste, everyone starts listening to Steve King. Tomorrow we march on Washington, jingling our keys, and we fill the chambers of the House and Senate and pick up our elected representatives and pass them, crowd surfing-style, hand over hand until we’ve pushed them all out the windows—all of them except Steve King, who called in sick. Steve King votes no on health care reform. It will probably take a few hours to get the liberty back, after which Steve King and we free Americans can set about electing new members of Congress and coaxing Sasha and Melia out of the crawl space. What happens after that? What happens next year, when Representative King is favor of raising the federal corn growers subsidy by 3% over the next ten years, and Michele Bachmann thinks it should be 2.5% over five, and it looks like Steve might win so she calls for the overthrow of Congress to preserve our liberty? Do we march down there and do the whole thing again?

Members of Congress must never call for the overthrow of Congress, even as a rhetorical trope. Forget the hypocrisy, the shameful hysteria, the cheapening of words like “freedom” and “tyranny.” We simply cannot govern by encouraging the American people to disregard our system of government. Congressman King wants to empower the American people to physically capture Capitol Hill in order to prevent the legal passage of a bill they don’t like. Has it occurred to him what else they might be empowered to do? Has it occurred to him that, in four years or forty, Washington might not be in the hands of the Democrats, and delegitimizing our elected government might not serve his own party’s interests?

I don’t object to Steve King because he has no sense of historical perspective. I don’t object to him because he consistently misrepresents the bill he opposes, or because he can’t explain why he opposes it without invoking vague, irrelevant ideas about liberty and tyranny. I don’t even object to him because he called for the overthrow of the United States government. I object to Steve King because he is too stupid to realize that the strategy that works for him this week will completely screw him in the long run. He is undermining the Congress he hopes to run. That a United States Representative—one of the 435 men and women we have chosen to act on behalf of 300 million of us—can’t foresee the consequences of his actions even one election in advance is both astonishing and unacceptable. It’s not that Steve King is playing checkers while the rest of us are trying to play chess. It’s that he keeps knocking over the board. Mister King, you are too stupid to run the country. Please sit down.

Combat! blog is free. Why not share it?
Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Reddit


  1. bravo.

    I had the misfortune of sitting next to one of Grassley’s senior aides at a bar a couple weeks back. He was crass, spiteful, and utterly charmless – one of those high school milquetoasts whose greatest talent is holding a grudge.

  2. After Americans peacefully accepted the court-determined results of the presidential election in 2000; and after Obama’s election to the presidency in 2008, I deeply resent exhortations to void those elections by mobbing the capitol. I especially resent such exhortations when they come from elected representatives already dining at the public trough.

    Why doesn’t Mr. King give back his salary, return to Iowa, and tell Washington to shove it? He would thereby neatly overturn the election that brought him to office, distance himself from the communist regime he professes has taken over Congress, and sow consternation in the ranks of government by his utter repudiation of further participation.

    He could also pay for his own stamps and rants.

  3. Those of us who are from Iowa and continue to live in Iowa hope on some days that come Census time, when our representation is likely reduced to four congressmen, that they will simply keep districts one through four and not represent the fifth district.

  4. Thanks for a very thoughtful post. King has truly proven himself to be a total idiot, and on top of that he’s insulted everyone who actually suffered under communist regimes. This sort of stupidity is not to be taken lightly and I hope Iowa voters will do the right thing and remove him from office at the next opportunity.

    On another note: as an American living in the Czech Republic, I can confirm that the Czech healthcare system is overall far superior to the US “system” – it is thoroughly government-regulated, affordable and universal. People get the care they need, and no one dies or goes bankrupt due to an illness or injury. If King really wants the US to follow in the path set by the Velvet Revolution, he should also push for universal healthcare, long-term unemployment pay, childbirth payments and 3-year paid maternity leaves, and other such Czech social welfare functions. (But no, that would be infringing on the great American freedom to suffer!)

Leave a Comment.