Combat! blog meets deadline, is not otherwise useful

Robots print funny cultural criticism on screens at the Combat! factory.

Robots print funny cultural criticism on computer screens at the Combat! factory.

It’s Monday, and I’ve got a job of work to do before I can even think about such frivolities as Combat! blog. Obviously I’m shirking, because here I am thinking about it now. But in minutes I will hurl myself back into productive composition again, with nary an internet to distract me. There is no Combat! blog today, paradoxically because I am a professional writer. While I get that paper, how about you read this rad cowboy story by Stephen King, published in the New Yorker and brought to my attention by Ben al-Fowlkes. If you have extra time, you should consider the arbitrary distinction we were taught to make between genre and literary fiction, when “literary” is obviously just another genre. That’s a whole nother blog post for a whole nother time, though, and that time is not here yet. Maybe it will arrive tomorrow.

 

Friday links! Invincible perfection of ideology edition

Vladimir Putin and a puppy that later betrayed him

Vladimir Putin and a puppy that later betrayed him

We all know that one ideology is correct. That’s just common sense. So many ideas are wrong, and so many people are wrong for holding them, that there must necessarily be a way of thinking and behaving that is absolutely right. It’s like when you see land; you know there must be an ocean somewhere, because otherwise you would just be seeing space. But how can you know which ideology is correct? With your heart, obviously. And how can you know whether you are adhering to that ideology enough? Through constant vigilance—specifically, constant vigilance of others. Today is Friday, as other people will agree but maybe not enough. Won’t you believe perfectly in a perfect ideology and become invincible with me?

Continue reading

Ten Republicans block Medicaid expansion in Montana

Rep. Art Wittich (R-Belgrade) neither smelt nor dealt it.

Rep. Art Wittich (R-Belgrade) denies having smelt or dealt it.

Back in 2010, after more than a year of cutthroat legislative maneuvering, Congress passed the Affordable Care Act. Part of that law was a provision to expand Medicaid coverage to households whose income was within 138% of the poverty level. Funding for this expansion would come entirely from the federal government until 2020, after which states would pick up 10% of the tab. In Montana, Medicaid expansion would insure 70,0000 people and bring $5 billion into the state over the next five years.

Two years ago, a bill to accept this federal money and insurance failed in the state Senate by one miscast vote. The Montana legislature meets every two years, so proponents of Medicaid expansion had time to organize before their next opportunity. Last Friday, dozens of supporters addressed the House Health and Human Services Committee for more than six hours, after which the committee voted “do not pass” on the Healthy Montana Act along party lines.

The bill will now require a 60-vote supermajority to reach the State House floor. Rep. Art Wittich (R–Belgrade) has used his chairmanship to ensure that a proposal from the Governor to comply with federal law—a proposal that enjoyed near-majority support in the last legislative session and has been endorsed by health care providers, bankers and politicians across the state—will not even be debated in the House. He must be very certain he’s right. I wrote about it in this week’s column for the Missoula Independent, which I urge you to read and then forward to him. The representative from Belgrade is active on Twitter at @ArtWittich. Drop him a respectful line and suggest that he reconsider his position. We’ll be back tomorrow with Friday links.

Fredrik deBoer on “critique drift”

Mansplaining

Yesterday, Fredrik deBoer posted this long and thoughtful essay on a phenomenon he calls “critique drift.” I assume the internet hates him now. You should read the whole piece, but deBoer nicely summarizes his own argument in this passage:

Critique drift is the phenomenon in which a particular critical political lens that correctly identifies a problem gets generalized and used less and less specifically over time. This in turn blunts the force of the critique and ultimately fuels a backlash against it. Critique drift is a way that good political arguments go bad.

DeBoer cites three concepts from the rhetoric of social justice/intersectionality that reflect critique drift: mansplainingtone policing, and gaslighting. Note that he does not say these phenomena aren’t real—only that the lefty internet increasingly uses them in contexts where they don’t apply.

Continue reading

Poll says Fox is most trusted news network

Screenshot

Look upon this Quinnipiac poll, O ye mighty, and despair. Asked which national news network they trusted most, 29% of voters polled answered Fox News. That gave Fox a plurality of most-trusted responses, ahead of CNN (22%) and ABC and NBC (10% apiece.) Before we shut down democracy and enter the market for a benevolent dictator, though,  we should consider what this poll really tells us.

Continue reading