Here we are in the after-noon, and Combat! blog has spent the whole day probing its essential systems. This morning I went to the ENT, who passed two hours marrying orifice to object. When I finally got home and fired up Old Lappy, she too was mysteriously ill. I’ve been isolating variables since and can now report cautious optimism. She seems fixed. Thanks to the placebo effect, I’m really noticing an improvement in performance. It’s like a whole new machine. Except for the time it took to get it—it would have been much faster to go to Best Buy and purchase a new laptop. But such waste would attract Kardashians, and we eschew it.
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Friday links! Wisdom of crowds edition
Donald Trump is the Garfield of politics: fucking stupid, but in the newspaper every day. He must be great, though, because 20% of Republican-leaning voters who responded to a Quinnipiac poll said he was their guy. That puts him ahead of both the guy who stopped the teacher’s union and the bad president’s brother. Trump has been the front runner since he announced his candidacy.There must be something about him elite media dictators like myself just don’t understand—something authentic. Something real—whatever it is, it’s definitely real. Today is Friday, and we all know the wisdom of crowds, so where does that leave us? Won’t you play the fool with me?
Friday links! Possible boners edition
“Everything is only for a day,” Marcus Aurelius writes in book IV of the Meditations, “both that which remembers and that which is remembered.” He means don’t worry about your historical reputation, because the people who know it will all die, too. Still, among the living, it’s hard not to hope posterity will like us. I think of my grandparents’ segment of history—from the Depression through fascism into boom decades culminating in the hypertrophied 1980s—and I am overwhelmed with admiration. Then I try to come up with titles for our chapter of the history books. “Deficits and Decay” seems toppable. “Where Animals Went” would work in a work of popular nonfiction. Today is Friday, and history might remember us as people who didn’t think about the future, but not in the good way like Marcus Aurelius wants. Won’t you chortle at the boners with me?
Missoula Co. sheriff’s office claims Missoulian agreed to limit access

Brenda Bassett, public information officer at the Missoula County Sheriff’s Office, in her days at KPAX
Last week, media blogger Jim Romenesko reported that the Missoula County Sheriff’s Office had announced an agreement with the Missoulian regarding cops and crime reporter Kathryn Haake. Citing Haake’s tendency to “contact multiple people within our office in an attempt to get more information than what she can legally be given,” public information officer Brenda Bassett said that “Kate has been instructed by her editor, to send all questions via email to me.” Missoulian editor Sherry Devlin disputed that. In her own email to Romenesko, Devlin said:
The Missoulian has no such arrangement or agreement with the sheriff’s office. They have made that demand and have attempted to have Kate removed from the beat because she asks questions that go beyond TV soundbites, and has covered both the sheriff’s critics as well as his supporters. She remains our police and courts reporter and has my full support. Her stories have been and are fair, balanced and accurate. I have at no time agreed to their demands.
That right there is a disagreement over facts, and it gets more complicated in the weeds of Romenesko’s post. But the upshot is that the sheriff’s office thinks it’s inappropriate for a reporter to call around and try to interview people, and it has insisted that the media only interact with its PR rep, in writing, on a timeline that gives her space to craft her answers.
That’s been a trend among Missoula County agencies lately. For the first few months after she took office, County Attorney Kirsten Pabst forbade any of her employees from talking to reporters; in April, she held a press conference at which she refused to take questions. The school board still hasn’t told us why it fired and reassigned a series of administrators last year. All three attempts to stonewall the media coincided with scandals: two lawsuits and a public feud within the sheriff’s office, John Krakauer’s stinging indictment of Pabst in Missoula, and rumors of inappropriate relationships and sports-related retaliations in the schools.
Responding to scandal by shutting out the media is like responding to fire by smashing all the smoke detectors. It’ll keep things quiet for a while, but it’s guaranteed to make the problem worse. County agencies have a responsibility to the people they serve, and that responsibility includes communicating openly and honestly with the press. You can read my opinions about that in this week’s column for the Missoula Independent.
Kate Haake is a nice lady I like Kate Haake, and Bassett shouldn’t lambast her for doing her job. Like the county attorney and the school board, the sheriff is an elected official. The people who read the newspaper are his bosses. The moment he stops talking to us is the moment I lose confidence in his office.
Mall developers ask for $13M in city funds

The old movie theater that went out of business, about a mile from the new theater everyone will love
Last week, developers presented the Missoula Redevelopment Agency with a plan to expand Southgate Mall using $13 million in public funds. Included in that total was a $5.2 million right-of-way fee the city might pay to build a new road connecting Brooks and Reserve Streets through mall property. You read that right: the owners of Southgate designed a street to funnel traffic to their business, and they want the city of Missoula to pay $5 million for the privilege of building it. It’s a gutsy ask, but what is more surprising is that it will probably work.
The MRA has acknowledged that the mall’s proposal asks for more money than it usually spends and significantly exceeds the public-to-private funding ratio in the agency’s guidelines, but they lean toward doing it. I quote the Missoulian:
[MRA staff] also noted the risk of not taking action, saying that other malls across the country are failing. In the event that Southgate Mall did fail—it’s financially strong currently—the empty building would spread blight and cost much more to raze for another use.
I’m not sure that makes sense. The city should invest $13 million in Southgate because malls across the country are failing? And our privately-owned mall deserves millions of taxpayer dollars even though it’s doing well? That sounds less like a plan for urban renewal than an award to real estate developers for maximally influencing city government. You can read my scurrilous remarks in this week’s column for the Missoula Independent.
I imagine some of you did not wake up this morning wondering what’s to become of Urban Renewal District III in Missoula, Montana, but I submit that there’s no machination like municipal government machinations, and the cogs of Missoula’s government are particularly exposed. Even if you don’t plan on visiting Southgate Mall, the mechanisms by which real-estate developers secure $13 million in public funding for a perfectly healthy private enterprise are worth considering. If you want to understand how corporatocracy works in the United States of America, consider how it operates in small-town Montana. We’ll be back tomorrow with Friday links.



