Ladies and gentlemen, a straw man

I should warn you right away that today’s post is probably a variation on what Richard Hofstadter called the paranoid style in American politics. I mean the style, not the essay. Yesterday, the White House withdrew its threat to veto S. 1867, the defense authorization bill that provides for (A) annual Pentagon funding and policy directives and (B) the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens suspected of aiding terrorists. See, it does two things. But don’t worry—the White House has concluded that:

the language [in Sec. 1031 of the bill] does not challenge or constrain the president’s ability to collect intelligence, incapacitate dangerous terrorists, and protect the American people, and the president’s senior advisors will not recommend a veto.

Press Secretary Carney’s remarks were interrupted when a bunch of crows got scared and flew away.

Continue reading

Combat! blog is seeing other blogs

Combat! blog will operatively not exist today so that I can help Ben al-Fowlkes with his annual MMA Fighting holiday greeting. Probably that sentence did not make sense to you. For context, here’s the holiday greeting we made for Cage Potato a couple of years ago:

Seasons Greetings From Cagepotato.com – Watch MoreFunny Videos
So you can see that I have important work to do. We’ll be back tomorrow to talk about the consequences of Newt Gingrich’s eating a golden retriever puppy on live TV. Technically that’s conjecture, but I’m pretty sure it’ll happen.

 

Friday links! You did what? edition

A rare photo of Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke not loaning half the GDP at .01%

I am willing to accept a modicum of secrecy in my US government. If the pillars of our democracy rest on a certain amount of secret alien dissection and Chinese cyberwar, I’ll go along. But one of those pillars is consent of the governed, and I cannot consent to stuff I don’t know about. A little-r republican system—in which people vote or don’t vote for various representatives based partly on what they do in office—does not work when we’re not sure what our government is doing. Call me Judy Garland, but I also believe that our elected leaders behave a little more scrupulously when they know the American people are watching. Secrecy protects Them from Us, and I personally am a longtime subscriber to the adage that government should fear the people and not the other way around. It’s Friday, as far as we know, and today’s link roundup is full of stories about things we should have known about earlier. Frankly, it’s harrowing. But before we get started, I think you need to watch this video.

Continue reading

Combat! blog flies through air, isn’t useful

Combat! blog wings its way to sunny Los Angeles this morning, which means I will spend my day considering the problem of others under my breath in line rather than, you know, on-line. We’ll be back tomorrow with all sorts of specious claims. In the meantime, how about you enjoy this jam from The Death Set’s new Michel Poiccard LP? You know you love the Death Set.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeqCB9vV_QM

 

 

Learn valuable social mechanics from Rick Perry

A peter, Paul and Perry

You can tell that Rick Perry’s stock has dropped since his well-publicized gaffe last week, because now he has to hang out with bottom-tier Republican candidates. CBS News has released this oddly compelling video of Perry broing down with Rick Santorum and Ron Paul prior to Sunday night’s foreign policy debate, as Newt Gingrich waits aloof in the background. Newt Gingrich is potentially too presidential for Rick Perry now. It’s like when the captain of your high school drill team is disfigured in an accident* and learns to be a better person, except Perry is probably not learning. His exchange with Paul and Santorum is remarkably instructive for us, though, as it offers a rare chance to evaluate these men as people rather than as political marketing constructs. The result is weirdly touching. Props to Pete for the link, and video after the jump.

Continue reading